← All Advisories
Reported from OT-Advisories.com as of

CVE-2026-53145

Last refreshed2026-10-17

Status: UPDATED  |  Advisory ID: CVE-2026-53145

Key Details

CVECVE-2026-53145
CVSS Score / Version
7.8 (High) / CVSS v3.1
Updated2026-10-16
CVSS Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS Prose
attack vector is local; attack complexity is low; privileges required is low; user interaction is none; scope is unchanged; confidentiality impact is high; integrity impact is high; availability impact is high.
Affected products
see table below
Classified as
CWE-367 (Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition)

Affected Products, Subsystems & Sectors

VendorProductAffected VersionsPatch Status
Red HatEnterprise Linux
LinuxLinux Kernel
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 10
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7
SubsystemsOT Supporting Infrastructure
SectorsAll Sectors

What to Know

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

drm/gem: Try to fix change_handle ioctl, attempt 4

[airlied: just added some comments on how to reenable]

On-list because the cat is out of the bag and we're clearly not good

enough to figure this out in private. The story thus far:

5e28b7b94408 ("drm: Set old handle to NULL before prime swap in

change_handle") tried to fix a race condition between the gem_close and

gem_change_handle ioctls, but got a few things wrong:

- There's a confusion with the local variable handle, which is actually

the new handle, and so the two-stage trick was actually applied to the

wrong idr slot. 7164d78559b0 ("drm/gem: fix race between

change_handle and handle_delete") tried to fix that by adding yet

another code block, but forgot to add the error handling. Which meant

we now have two paths, both kinda wrong.

- dc366607c41c ("drm: Replace old pointer to new idr") tried to apply

another fix, but inconsistently, again because of the handle confusion

- this would be the right fix (kinda, somewhat, it's a mess) if we'd

do the two-stage approach for the new handle. Except that wasn't the

intent of the original fix.

We also didn't have an igt merged for the original ioctl, which is a big

no-go. This was attempted to address off-list in the original bugfix,

and amd QA people claimed the bug was fixed now. Very clearly that's not

the case. Here's my attempt to sort this out:

- Rename the local variable to new_handle, the old aliasing with

args->handle is just too dangerously confusing.

- Merge the gem obj lookup with the two-stage idr_replace so that we

avoid getting ourselves confused there.

- This means we don't have a surplus temporary reference anymore, only

an inherited from the idr. A concurrent gem_close on the new_handle

could steal that. Fix that with the same two-stage approach

create_tail uses. This is a bit overkill as documented in the comment,

but I also don't trust my ability to understand this all correctly, so

go with the established pattern we have from other ioctls instead for

maximum paranoia.

- Adjust error paths. I've tried to make the error and success paths

common, because they are identical except for which handle is removed

and on which we call idr_replace to (re)install the object again. But

that made things messier to read, so I've left it at the more verbose

version, which unfortunately hides the symmetry in the entire code

flow a bit.

- While at it, also replace the 7 space indent with 1 tab.

And finally, because I flat out don't trust my abilities here at all

anymore:

- Disable the ioctl until we have the igt situation and everything else

sorted out on-list and with full consensus.

v2:

Sashiko noticed that I didn't handle the error path for idr_replace

correctly, it must be checked with IS_ERR_OR_NULL like in

gem_handle_delete. So yeah, definitely should just the existing paths

1:1 because this is endless amounts of tricky.

Also add the Fixes: line for the original ioctl, I forgot that too. (NVD)

What to Do

Monitor Red Hat's and Linux's web pages for any future patch releases.

References

SourceReference
NVDhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-53145
CVEhttps://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-53145
Report compilation © 2026 OT-Advisories.com  ·  CC BY 4.0  ·  Source materials remain the property of their respective publishers as cited.