← All Advisories
Reported from OT-Advisories.com as of

CVE-2026-64112

Last refreshed2026-10-17

Status: UPDATED  |  Advisory ID: CVE-2026-64112

Key Details

CVECVE-2026-64112
CVSS Score / Version
7.8 (High) / CVSS v3.1
Updated2026-10-16
CVSS Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS Prose
attack vector is local; attack complexity is low; privileges required is low; user interaction is none; scope is unchanged; confidentiality impact is high; integrity impact is high; availability impact is high.
Affected products
Linux Kernel
Classified as
CWE-367 (Time-of-check Time-of-use (TOCTOU) Race Condition)

Affected Products, Subsystems & Sectors

VendorProductAffected VersionsPatch Status
LinuxLinux Kernel
SubsystemsOT Supporting Infrastructure
SectorsAll Sectors

What to Know

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

rbd: eliminate a race in lock_dwork draining on unmap

Given how rbd_lock_add_request() and rbd_img_exclusive_lock() are

written, lock_dwork may be (re)queued more than it's actually needed:

for example in case a new I/O request comes in while we are in the

middle of rbd_acquire_lock() on behalf of another I/O request. This is

expected and with rbd_release_lock() preemptively canceling lock_dwork

is benign under normal operation.

A more problematic example is maybe_kick_acquire():

if (have_requests || delayed_work_pending(&rbd_dev->lock_dwork)) {

dout("%s rbd_dev %p kicking lock_dwork\n", __func__, rbd_dev);

mod_delayed_work(rbd_dev->task_wq, &rbd_dev->lock_dwork, 0);

}

It's not unrealistic for lock_dwork to get canceled right after

delayed_work_pending() returns true and for mod_delayed_work() to

requeue it right there anyway. This is a classic TOCTOU race.

When it comes to unmapping the image, there is an implicit assumption

of no self-initiated exclusive lock activity past the point of return

from rbd_dev_image_unlock() which unlocks the lock if it happens to be

held. This unlock is assumed to be final and lock_dwork (as well as

all other exclusive lock tasks, really) isn't expected to get queued

again. However, lock_dwork is canceled only in cancel_tasks_sync()

(i.e. later in the unmap sequence) and on top of that the cancellation

can get in effect nullified by maybe_kick_acquire(). This may result

in rbd_acquire_lock() executing after rbd_dev_device_release() and

rbd_dev_image_release() run and free and/or reset a bunch of things.

One of the possible failure modes then is a violated

rbd_assert(rbd_image_format_valid(rbd_dev->image_format));

in rbd_dev_header_info() which is called via rbd_dev_refresh() from

rbd_post_acquire_action().

Redo exclusive lock task draining to provide saner semantics and try

to meet the assumptions around rbd_dev_image_unlock(). (NVD)

What to Do

Monitor Linux's web page for any future patch releases.

References

SourceReference
NVDhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-64112
CVEhttps://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-64112
Report compilation © 2026 OT-Advisories.com  ·  CC BY 4.0  ·  Source materials remain the property of their respective publishers as cited.