← All Advisories
Reported from OT-Advisories.com as of

CVE-2026-80527

Last refreshed2026-10-17

Status: UPDATED  |  Advisory ID: CVE-2026-80527

Key Details

CVECVE-2026-80527
CVSS Score / Version
7.5 (High) / CVSS v3.1
Updated2026-10-16
CVSS Vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS Prose
attack vector is network; attack complexity is low; privileges required is none; user interaction is none; scope is unchanged; confidentiality impact is none; integrity impact is none; availability impact is high.
Affected products
Linux Kernel

Affected Products, Subsystems & Sectors

VendorProductAffected VersionsPatch Status
LinuxLinux Kernel
SubsystemsOT Supporting Infrastructure
SectorsAll Sectors

What to Know

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

ceph: fix hanging __ceph_get_caps() with stale mds_wanted

A reader can hang forever in __ceph_get_caps() when the client no

longer holds `FILE_RD`, but local cap state still says that the

capability is already wanted (via `mds_wanted`).

One way to trigger this is through MDS cap revocation. If another

client performs a conflicting operation, the MDS can revoke `FILE_RD`

from the reader; the next read then has to reacquire `FILE_RD`. If

the cap update that should request `FILE_RD` never reaches the MDS

after `cap->mds_wanted` was raised, the reader is left holding only

non-file caps while local `mds_wanted` still includes the file read

caps.

In that state, try_get_cap_refs() sees `need <= mds_wanted` and

returns 0, so __ceph_get_caps() just waits on `i_cap_wq`. If the cap

update that was supposed to request `FILE_RD never reaches the MDS

after `cap->mds_wanted was` raised, no further request is sent and the

waiter can sleep indefinitely until unrelated cap traffic happens to

wake it up.

The ordering issue is that `cap->mds_wanted` is updated in

__prep_cap() before the `CEPH_MSG_CLIENT_CAPS message` is actually

queued for send. That makes one field serve two different meanings at

once: what this client wants, and what the client believes the MDS

already knows it wants.

A proper fix would be to split those states and track whether a cap

update is actually in flight or has been observed by the MDS.

However, simply moving the `cap->mds_wanted assignment` later would

not be sufficient: queueing the message in the messenger does not

guarantee that the MDS processed that specific wanted set, and

reconnect or message loss can still invalidate that assumption.

Fixing that properly would require a larger rework of the cap state

machine.

To allow simpler backports to stable kernels, this patch implements a

simpler workaround:

- stop waiting forever in __ceph_get_caps(); after a bounded wait,

fall back to the renew path

- make ceph_renew_caps() issue a synchronous `OPEN` request whenever

the inode still does not actually hold the wanted caps, instead of

only calling ceph_check_caps()

The extra issued-vs-wanted check in ceph_renew_caps() is necessary

because the previous test only checked whether the inode still had any

real caps at all. That is not enough after revocation: the client can

still hold something like `pLs` and yet be missing `FILE_RD`

completely. In that case, falling back to ceph_check_caps() is not

sufficient, because it still trusts `cap->mds_wanted` and may resend

nothing. By requiring `(issued & wanted) == wanted` before taking the

asynchronous path, the code only uses ceph_check_caps() when the

`wanted caps` are already actually issued. Otherwise, it sends the

synchronous `OPEN` renew.

This preserves the existing asynchronous fast path when the wanted

caps are already issued, avoids changing cap-state semantics, and

fixes the hang by guaranteeing that a stalled waiter eventually

retries through a path that does not rely on the stale `mds_wanted`

state.

[ idryomov: move CEPH_GET_CAPS_WAIT_TIMEOUT from libceph.h to

mds_client.h, formatting ] (NVD)

What to Do

Monitor Linux's web page for any future patch releases.

References

SourceReference
NVDhttps://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-80527
CVEhttps://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-80527
Report compilation © 2026 OT-Advisories.com  ·  CC BY 4.0  ·  Source materials remain the property of their respective publishers as cited.